Today Jody Joiner and I presented at the AHLA Hospitals and Health Systems Institute on the use of social media by hospitals and health care providers. We provided an overview of social media use by hospitals and health care providers, discussed the pros/cons of using social media in the health care environment, presented case studies of the risks and legal implications and did a short role play involving tweets in the context of a medical negligence case. We also provided those attending with recommendations on developing social media guidelines and policies.
To show the speed and ease of using social media tools to spread information, news and photos we we did some live shots during the presentations using an iPhone that were then loaded up to my blog, Twitter and Facebook. We then pulled up the posts and tweets at the end of our hour presentation.
Great audience with great follow up questions. Thanks go out to Mark Browne (@ConsultDoc) and Peter Leibold (@HealthLawyers) for live tweeting during the session.
Categoris
- #FitWV (2)
- 2011 (1)
- 4th Circuit (1)
- Accounting (1)
- advance directives (1)
- AHLA (9)
- AHLA Connections (1)
- ama (3)
- American Well (1)
- anatomy (1)
- anonymous (2)
- Antikickback (1)
- arbitration (1)
- Arizona (1)
- ARRA (15)
- Atari (1)
- Athena Health (1)
- attorney general (1)
- attorney-client privilege (1)
- authorization (1)
- Avvo (2)
- baby boomers (1)
- beBetter (1)
- Best Lawyers (6)
- Bethany College (2)
- bigfoot (1)
- black friday (1)
- Blacksburg (1)
- blawg (9)
- Blawg Review (6)
- blawgreview (4)
- Blog (12)
- blog rally (2)
- Blog World (1)
- blogger (10)
- blogger buzz (1)
- Blogging (20)
- blogs (13)
- Blogs of Note (1)
- Board of Medicine (1)
- Body Browser (1)
- book banning (1)
- bosworth (1)
- Boy Scout (1)
- brailer (1)
- bug (1)
- business associate (1)
- butterfly (1)
- CAB (2)
- California (2)
- camera (1)
- cardiac (1)
- Carlyle (1)
- carnival (2)
- CCHIT (1)
- Certificate of Need (20)
- certification (2)
- Charleston (24)
- Charleston Area Alliance (2)
- CHCF (1)
- Christmas (2)
- CIO (1)
- Cleveland Clinic (2)
- CMS (8)
- computers (1)
- CON (21)
- conference (3)
- confidentiality (2)
- Congress (3)
- Connecticut (1)
- Conroy (1)
- consumer (3)
- Consumers Checkbook (1)
- cookies (1)
- CoP (1)
- costs (3)
- couch (1)
- country doctor (1)
- Create WV (9)
- creative (5)
- credentialing (1)
- criminal (2)
- CT (1)
- cycling (1)
- Dartmouth (1)
- data breach (11)
- dCard (1)
- DEA (1)
- Deal (1)
- death (1)
- DHHR (2)
- DHHS (2)
- diabetes (2)
- diabetes mine (2)
- diabetic (1)
- Digital Health Revolution (1)
- Disclosures (1)
- Dossia (1)
- Dr. Val (2)
- drafting (1)
- Earth Day (1)
- eBay (1)
- economy (1)
- education (1)
- EHR (11)
- election (1)
- electronic prescription (1)
- Emergiblog (1)
- employment (1)
- employment law (2)
- EMR (7)
- end of life care (5)
- enforcement (1)
- Engage with Grace (3)
- entrepreneurship (2)
- environmental (1)
- epresribing (4)
- ethics (1)
- Eweek (1)
- EWG (1)
- Executive Order (1)
- Express Scripts (1)
- FACA (1)
- Facebook (5)
- false claims (2)
- family (1)
- FBI (1)
- FDA (1)
- Federal Register (4)
- FestiVALL (9)
- FICO (1)
- fiesta bowl (1)
- film (1)
- Final 4 (1)
- FitWV (2)
- flea (2)
- Florida (1)
- flu (2)
- flu trends (2)
- FOIA (2)
- football (1)
- fraud (1)
- Frischkorn (1)
- FSB (1)
- FTC (3)
- genealogy (1)
- George Clooney (1)
- gift (1)
- Glendale (1)
- GoHelp (1)
- Google (14)
- Google Health (5)
- Government (3)
- grammar (1)
- Grand Rounds (8)
- guitar hero (1)
- H1N1 (1)
- hail (1)
- harm (1)
- HCB2007 (1)
- HCQIA (1)
- HCSM (2)
- health (13)
- health care (50)
- health 2.0 (61)
- health care (68)
- health care reform (3)
- Health Cloud (1)
- health information technology (34)
- Health Wonk Review (1)
- Healthcare Blogging Summit (2)
- HealthVault (3)
- HFMA (1)
- HHS (10)
- HIE (9)
- HIMSS (1)
- HIO (1)
- HIPAA (33)
- HISPC (1)
- history (1)
- HIT (14)
- HIT Policy Committee (2)
- HIT Standards Committee (2)
- HITECH (24)
- holiday (1)
- home health (1)
- hospital (12)
- house call (1)
- Howell (1)
- HRSA (1)
- human body (1)
- human subjects research (1)
- HWR (1)
- Internet (1)
- Intuit (1)
- Iowa (1)
- Joint Commission (2)
- judges (1)
- Julian Beever (1)
- jury (1)
- Justia (1)
- Kaiser (1)
- Kentucky (1)
- Kibbee (1)
- kickback (1)
- Kiplinger (2)
- KY (1)
- Las Vegas (1)
- law (57)
- law 2.0 (2)
- Leavitt (1)
- legal contracts (1)
- legal ethics (3)
- Legislature (3)
- LeMoyne Coffield (1)
- liability (1)
- liberal arts (2)
- licensure (1)
- lifeline (1)
- lions (1)
- litigation (2)
- Lorman (2)
- Manor Care (1)
- Markle (1)
- mashup (1)
- Massachusetts (1)
- Mayo (1)
- McCain (1)
- Meaningful Use (3)
- Medicaid (4)
- Medicaid Redesign (4)
- medical home (1)
- medical malpractice (1)
- medical records (2)
- Medicare (10)
- medicine (1)
- medicine 2.0 (2)
- Medpedia (1)
- meme (1)
- mental health (1)
- metadata (2)
- Mexico (1)
- Michigan (1)
- micro practice (1)
- Microsoft (6)
- Microsoft Healthvault (4)
- minimum necessary (1)
- mobile device (1)
- moms (1)
- Mountaineers (5)
- music (3)
- myhealthdata (1)
- MySpace (1)
- NCAA (1)
- NCVHS (4)
- Never Events (1)
- New Martinsville (3)
- New York Times (1)
- Nexeon (1)
- NLRB (1)
- Northern District (1)
- notification (2)
- NYT (3)
- Obama (5)
- obesity (2)
- OCR (12)
- OHFLAC (1)
- Ohio (1)
- OIG (3)
- ONC (18)
- Orlando (2)
- Oxycontin (1)
- patient safety (1)
- patientslikeme (2)
- peerclip (1)
- PEIA (1)
- penalties (2)
- Pennsylvania (1)
- personal health records (2)
- Pew (2)
- Pfister (1)
- pharmacy (1)
- PHI (1)
- photo (1)
- PHR (18)
- physician (18)
- Picture West Virginia (2)
- podcast (1)
- Politics (2)
- PowerPoint (1)
- PPS (1)
- preemption (1)
- presidential debate (2)
- prevention (1)
- privacy (44)
- privileging (1)
- pro hac vice (3)
- Providence (1)
- public health (2)
- Purkinje (1)
- rainmaking (1)
- reform (2)
- regulations (1)
- retail clinic (1)
- retention (1)
- revolution health (4)
- revoluton health (1)
- RHIO (1)
- Rick Lee (2)
- risk (1)
- rock band (1)
- Rockefeller (1)
- Rodriquez (1)
- RSS (2)
- rules (1)
- Saas (1)
- SAMHSA (1)
- Scribe Media (1)
- Search Story (1)
- Searls (1)
- Second Life (1)
- security (21)
- self referral (1)
- sermo (3)
- social media (18)
- social networking (5)
- Stark (5)
- State Journal (1)
- stent (1)
- stereotypes (1)
- storm (1)
- substance abuse (2)
- survey (1)
- swine (1)
- Swine Flu (1)
- tag cloud (1)
- tax (1)
- technology (3)
- teleconference (1)
- Texas (1)
- Thanksgiving (1)
- theatre (1)
- This Week In Law (1)
- timeline (1)
- Tour de France (1)
- transparency (3)
- turkey (1)
- TWiL (1)
- Twitter (12)
- United States District Court (2)
- Unknown Hinson (1)
- Veterans Day (1)
- Virginia (2)
- Virginia Tech (1)
- virtual medicine (1)
- VT (1)
- Walt Disney World (1)
- Washington Post (1)
- web 2.0 (8)
- West Virginia (130)
- West Virginia College of Law (2)
- West Virginia State Bar (2)
- WHCC (1)
- Wii (1)
- wiki (3)
- wild (1)
- willful neglect (1)
- wistleblower (1)
- wonderful (1)
- Wordle (2)
- world diabetes day (1)
- World's Strongest Man (2)
- WSJ (5)
- WV (140)
- WV FestiVALL (1)
- WVBOM (1)
- WVHCA (11)
- WVHII (2)
- WVHIN (8)
- WVMI (1)
- WVPBS (1)
- WVRHITEC (1)
- WVSCA (2)
- wvu (4)
- X PRIZE (1)
- YouTube (2)
- ZDNet (1)
AHLA Hospital's Friend or Foe: The Age of Social Media and Health 2.0
Friday, February 26, 2010Posted by Oliver at 10:30 AM 0 comments
Labels: AHLA, health 2.0, law, social media
AIS Report on Patient Privacy: Analysis of Willful Neglect Under HITECH
Sunday, February 14, 2010Recently I was interviewed for a story focused on the changes to the HIPAA civil penalty enforcement under the HITECH Act.
The article, Willful Neglect Is Difficult to Pin Down, but Can Result in Enormous HIPAA Penalties, appears in the Report on Patient Privacy: Practical News and Strategies for Complying with HIPAA, Volume 10, Number 2 February 2010 published by Atalantic Information Services, Inc. (AIS). The article discusses the definition and interpretation of "willful neglect" under the HIPAA penalty provisions. Health care privacy officers should find this article helpful in better understanding their role and responsibility in overseeing privacy compliance efforts.
The full story was reprinted on AIS Health Business Daily website.
Posted by Oliver at 3:09 PM 0 comments
Labels: HIPAA, HITECH, penalties, privacy, willful neglect
WV HIT Funding Under HITECH: WVHIN Gets $7.8M and WV REC gets $6M
Saturday, February 13, 2010Health and Human Services Secretary Sebelius and the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, David Blumenthal, announced the HITECH funding under the ARRA for State Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) and Regional Extension Center (RECs) across the country.
The White House Press Release provides a detailed list of HIEs and RECs receiving grants. Inormation is also available via the HHS News Release, Sebelius, Solis Announce Nearly $1 Billion Recovery Act Investments in Advancing Use of Health IT, Training Works for Health Jobs of the Future.
West Virginia will receive the following funding:
- West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources in conjunction with the West Virginia Health Information Network HIE Award: $7,819,000
- West Virginia Health Improvement Institute, Inc. REC ward:$6,000,000
Posted by Oliver at 1:32 PM 0 comments
Labels: ARRA, health information technology, HHS, HIE, HIT, HITECH, ONC, West Virginia, WV, WVHIN
Model Jury Instruction: Warning Jurors on Use of Electronic Technology and Social Media
Wednesday, February 3, 2010The Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States has issued a memo regarding Juror Use of Electronic Communication Technologies.
At its December 2009 meeting, the Judicial Conference Committee endorsed a set of suggested jury instructions that federal district judges should consider using to help deter jurors from using electronic technologies to research or communicate about cases while they serve as jurors. The recommended instructions were developed as a result of the increased use of web enabled mobile phones and devices that can be used to research information and communicated in a variety of ways, including email, social media, etc.
The Proposed Model Jury Instruction reads as follows:
Before Trial:
You, as jurors, must decide this case based solely on the evidence presented here within the four walls of this courtroom. This means that during the trial you must not conduct any independent research about this case, the matters in the case, and the individuals or corporations involved in the case. In other words, you should not consult dictionaries or reference materials, search the internet, websites, blogs, or use any other electronic tools to obtain information about this case or to help you decide the case. Please do not try to find out information from any source outside the confines of this courtroom.
Until you retire to deliberate, you may not discuss this case with anyone, even your fellow jurors. After you retire to deliberate, you may begin discussing the case with your fellow jurors, but you cannot discuss the case with anyone else until you have returned a verdict and the case is at an end. I hope that for all of you this case is interesting and noteworthy. I know that many of you use cell phones, Blackberries, the internet and other tools of technology. You also must not talk to anyone about this case or use these tools to communicate electronically with anyone about the case. This includes your family and friends. You may not communicate with anyone about the case on your cell phone, through e-mail, Blackberry, iPhone, text messaging, or on Twitter, through any blog or website, through any internet chat room, or by way of any other social networking websites, including Facebook, My Space, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
At the Close of the Case:
During your deliberations, you must not communicate with or provide any information to anyone by any means about this case. You may not use any electronic device or media, such as a telephone, cell phone, smart phone, iPhone, Blackberry or computer; the internet, any internet service, or any text or instant messaging service; or any internet chat room, blog, or website such as Facebook, My Space, LinkedIn, YouTube or Twitter, to communicate to anyone any information about this case or to conduct any research about this case until I accept your verdict.
Posted by Oliver at 7:43 AM 0 comments
Labels: jury, law, social media, United States District Court